KeyShot vs Maxwell – Comparative Overview

Blog • KeyShot

The 3D rendering engine is the key to bringing your ideas from imagination into reality, from prototype to production. There are many types of engines out there (in this case, a V12 vs. a V2), each suited for certain purposes and speeds required by designers who want fast turnaround times or high-quality results, respectively. But no matter which one you use, it’s important not only to know how they work internally but also what type you need. What is your desired outcome?

In this article, we’ll explore an overview of KeyShot vs. Maxwell and the key features that distinguish the two well-known render engines.

Both KeyShot & Maxwell offer exceptional 3D renderings and can generally achieve very similar results.

KeyShot is widely known for its use in industrial design, soft goods, apparel, automotive, jewelry, and accessories. With a workflow-based interface, KeyShot is one of the easiest-to-learn and use rendering tools on the market. It boasts 700+ material presents, texture libraries, and, most importantly, KeyShot Cloud—one of the largest online resources for rendering assets and material sharing.

KeyShot is also considered one of the fastest rendering engines on the market. It utilizes 100% of your CPU (meaning the more cores, the faster it renders!), with optional one-click dedicated ray tracing accelerated GPU rendering as well. Every change you make—material, lighting, geometry—instantly updates in real time.

KeyShot

On the other hand, Maxwell is primarily known for its exceptional ability for architecture, interior, plant, and animal rendering due to the rendering engine being based on real-world units and settings. It is not necessary to learn strange new concepts and a long list of render parameters such as “radiosity bounces,” “photons,” or “final gathering” that are based purely on computer graphics terminology, not reality. For example, the settings of the Maxwell Render camera work and adjust just like the settings of a real camera, and the strength of the lights in your scene is based on real-world units.

The result is that Maxwell offers hyperrealistic images that are physically correct and unbiased, allowing users to create indistinguishable scenes from photographs. The downside to this method is it tends to be significantly slower to render.

Overall, regarding raw rendering utility, ease of use, and speed, KeyShot is loaded with features, with Maxwell playing an endless game of catch-up 100 paces behind.

Maxwell Render

Winner: KeyShot

Regarding animation, we can objectively say KeyShot dominates in this area. While it doesn’t provide a full-featured animation suite like some other programs, it has easy-to-use, robust features to animate parts, create walkthroughs, video fly-bys, exploded parts, and material/lighting animations. Best of all, the animations can be easily exported to other programs.

Maxwell, on the other hand, is extremely limited. It has basic lighting dials, a camera, and some object manipulation or rotation.

Winner: KeyShot

KeyShot offers a subscription model that returns you slightly more than Maxwell at $1,188. Additionally, several add-ons require a separate purchase if you’d like to expand the functionality. (such as KeyShotWeb & Network Rendering)

Maxwell is also subscription-based, with a bit more flexibility in that department. It offers locked or floating licenses or suites for specific 3D CAD tools. However, for the bundle (that includes all plugins/integrations), you’re still looking at $845.

Regarding integration, KeyShot seamlessly integrates with virtually every 3D CAD program available, while Maxwell only offers native integration for a few and notably misses many of the major industrial CAD tools. (PTC Creo, SiemensNX, AutoCAD Inventor, etc.) This gives you an idea of what audience Maxwell is targeting.

Beyond that, KeyShot is at the forefront of next-generation features, deploying updates and improvements frequently. It offers full VR support, a web portal for sharing your renderings on the web or in AR, and complete 3MF additive manufacturing exporting.

Winner: KeyShot

With its great 3D renderings, Maxwell may initially appear to be a strong contender in the field; however, it falls short outside of basic rendering and animation. Architects and interior renderers might find some value here. Still, for everyone else, KeyShot proves itself as the clear winner thanks to its ease of use and speed stability, along with bonuses such as animation capabilities, multi-faceted shaders, and lighting options (RealCloth™ and particle effects included), plus industry-leading out-of-the-box features!

Why not give a full-featured 14-day trial of KeyShot a try and see for yourself!

TriStar PLM Solutions welcomes questions. Feel free to CONTACT US if you can’t find what you’re looking for, or call us at 800-800-1714